Home
About
Archive
Electronic School: The School Technology Authority School Board Corner



Current Issue

Search

Forum

Reviews

Meetings

Socket

Links

Spin

How to Advertise

E-Wire: September 1998

What should kids know? New technology standards set expectations

Before completing second grade, kids should be able to use a computer keyboard and mouse and operate a VCR. By eighth grade, students should know how to detect bias in electronic information sources. And before graduating from high school, students should be able to apply intelligent agents and computer simulations to real-world problems.

These are just a few of the technology standards for students recommended by the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). In a new set of standards released in June, ISTE lays out a blueprint for what students as young as 4 years old should learn about computers and other technologies.

The standards have been criticized by some educators, who say they emphasize the development of technical skills over the importance of learning how to use computers to master subjects like math and history.

But the biggest criticisms, so far, are that the standards are advocating exposure to computers at very young ages.

"Children can manipulate a mouse at age 3 or 4 or 5," Jeffrey T. Fouts, a professor of education at Seattle Pacific University, told the New York Times. "It can be done. But a better question is: Should it be done at that young age?"

Jane M. Healy, whose new book Failure to Connect looks at what is good and bad for children who use computers, told the Times that "there is absolutely no demonstration [for young children] that the technology improves anything -- except a child's enthusiasm for playing with a new gadget."

Lajeane G. Thomas disagrees. Thomas, the project director of the National Educational Technology Standards Project, which is developing a host of new standards for using technology in education (including the ISTE standards), told the Times that people who say educational technology substitutes multimedia sizzle for content "do not have a clue about how technology should be used."

Among other things, the standards for grades pre-K to second grade include:

* Using interactive books, educational software, and elementary multimedia encyclopedias to support learning.

* Demonstrating positive social and ethical behaviors when using technology.

* Gathering information and communicating with others using telecommunications.

Special standards were developed for four different levels: pre-kindergarten to second grade, grades three to five, six to eight, and nine through 12.

For a printed copy of the standards, which costs $5, call (800) 336-5191.



Librarians set tech standards, too

School librarians are also weighing in on what kids should know to succeed in the Information Age. Among the top priorities are learning to evaluate information critically, appreciating literature, and recognizing the importance of information in a democratic society.

The nine standards, announced at the American Library Association (ALA) conference in June, are meant to guide school media specialists and other educators who are looking for ways to teach their students literacy in print, nonprint, and electronic formats.

"Student achievement is the bottom line," says Ken Haycock, president of the American Association of School Librarians. "Knowing how to obtain and use information properly is increasingly essential both for students' success in school and for their personal and professional development as socially responsible adults."

The standards cover three areas: information literacy, independent learning, and social responsibility. Each standard includes several "success indicators" and "levels of proficiency."

* Standard 1: The student who is information literate accesses information efficiently and effectively.

* Standard 2: The student who is information literate evaluates information critically and competently.

* Standard 3: The student who is information literate uses information accurately and creatively.

* Standard 4: The student who is an independent learner pursues information related to personal interests.

* Standard 5: The student who is an independent learner appreciates literature and other creative expressions of information.

* Standard 6: The student who is an independent learner strives for excellence in information seeking and knowledge generation.

* Standard 7: The student who contributes positively to the learning community and society recognizes the importance of information to a democratic society.

* Standard 8: The student who contributes positively to the learning community practices ethical behavior in regard to information and information technology.

* Standard 9: The student who contributes positively to the learning community participates effectively in groups to pursue and generate information.

For a printed copy of The Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning, contact ALA, 90 E. Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611; (800) 545-2433.



Schools need more technology -- now

A majority of American business leaders and voters say equipping schools with technology should be one of the nation's top educational priorities. But according to a national survey by the Milken Exchange on Education Technology, they're troubled that state governments are failing to move fast enough to address this need.

The survey, released in June at the Milken Family Foundation Education Conference in Los Angeles, was sent to voters, legislator-members of state education or appropriations committees, and business executives of U.S. companies with 25 or more employees, including 50 executives of Fortune 500 companies.

Speaking at the national conference, Intel Corp. chief executive Craig Barrett said the nation must do a better job of making computers part of teaching. Failure to foster a technologically savvy workforce, he warned, could lead to economic hardship in the future.

"I don't look at it just as an education issue," he said. "I look at it as a crass economics issue. There's a compelling need to get computers integrated into the educational process."

Some of the key findings of the Milken survey:

* Voters consider educational technology a higher priority than reducing class size or repairing school buildings. About 75 percent of voters favor spending any federal budget surplus on educational technology, while 70 percent say they advocate using the money to repair school buildings, and 58 percent would use it to reduce class size. Only 14 percent of voters say they would delay spending on educational technology because there is insufficient evidence of its impact on student achievement.

* State legislators are more satisfied with the status quo than voters and business leaders are. Roughly one of every two legislators surveyed believe their state is spending enough money on educational technology. Only 28 percent of the public and 29 percent of business leaders say they are satisfied.

* About 65 percent of voters predict research will eventually show technology has a major impact on improving education. About 36 percent say they are concerned about the lack of evidence thus far.

Lego Mindstorms Corner Kick
They might not be World Cup material, but these little "bricks with a brain" -- born at the MIT Media Lab -- are already scoring goals with Lego enthusiasts worldwide. Demonstrated for the first time this summer at the RoboCup in Paris, Lego Mindstorms comes with a miniature built-in computer so kids can design robots that move, rotate, and respond to light and touch. "The philosophy behind Lego Mindstorms is to allow children not only to understand technology, but also to become creative masters of it," says Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen, president and CEO of Lego Group. "This happens when they design, construct, and program their own real, intelligent inventions." The price of this inventiveness? Around $200 for a 700-piece set that includes one programmable brick.

How teachers use the web

Teachers and students are more likely to use the Internet for research than for anything else, according to a company that tracks marketing and education trends. Teachers are less enthusiastic about employing the Internet for classroom presentations and other Internet uses such as online projects, e-mail pals, and electronic field trips.

Quality Education Data (QED), a research and database company in Denver, surveyed 400 teachers in randomly selected curriculum areas (language arts, math, science, and social studies) about their attitudes and use of the Internet for instruction.

About 70 percent of teachers say they use the Internet for research at least once a week. Another popular use of the Internet among teachers is to access curriculum materials: 66 percent of teachers use the Internet for this purpose at least once a week. Nearly half of the respondents say students use the Internet for research at least once a week. Other uses were not even half as common as research.

The number of teachers with access to the Internet at home grew by 10 percentage points last year, to 56 percent. According to the survey, home Internet use influences whether teachers use the Internet in their classrooms. The proportion of teachers using the Internet in teaching rose by 17 percentage points from last year's total, to 65 percent. When asked how often they used the Internet in their classrooms or at home, 81 percent of the teachers reported that they use it at least once a week. This number, according to the report, suggests that teachers are using the Internet in teaching on a regular basis, rather than sporadically.

Other findings:

* 81 percent of schools have policies addressing acceptable Internet use.

* 44 percent of teachers say they trained themselves on how to use the Internet.

* Nearly half of teachers (46 percent) use the Internet for professional development.

To order a copy of Internet Usage in Public Schools 1998, Third Edition, contact Quality Education Data, 1700 Lincoln St., Suite 3600, Denver, CO 80203; (800) 525-5811.



CEOs speak out on technology training

Better preparation, more resources for training, plus incentive systems for integrating technology into the curriculum -- these professional development essentials are key if schools are to reach so-called Target Tech status, says a group of business and education leaders.

Last year, in its School Technology and Readiness (STaR) Report, the CEO Forum on Education and Technology identified typical school profiles ranging from "low tech" to "target tech" in terms of hardware, connectivity, content, and professional development. (See "STaR Report: Rate your school's digital prowess," January 1998.)

This year, the group zeroed in on professional development. Specific recommendations, announced in July, are arranged in four categories:

1. Schools of education must prepare new teachers to integrate technology effectively into the curriculum. Here the group calls for increased technology funding for schools of education, as well as technology requirements for accreditation and for new teacher licensure and certification.

2. Current teachers must be proficient in integrating technology into the curriculum. Every professional development program should include a relevant technology training component, the CEO Forum says, and every teacher should have ready access to a computer. Additional recommendations include technology requirements for continuing licensure, increased resources, and long-term training plans.

3. Education policy makers and school administrators must create systems that reward technology integration into the curriculum. Technology integration and innovation should be reflected in teacher and administrator evaluations, the group says, as well as in student performance assessments and curriculum standards and measurements.

4. Corporations and local businesses should partner with school of education to provide support and share best practices in the technology integration process.

An updated "STaR Chart," by which schools can evaluate their progress from low tech to target tech, is now available on the CEO Forum web site, and a second national STaR assessment is expected in February 1999.



Kids feel the pain of too much computing

Brendan Connell knows the dangers of too much computer time all too well. Last year, his Maryland high school had to provide him with a personal note-taker because he suffered debilitating wrist pain caused by repetitive use of a computer mouse and keyboard, according to the Washington Post.

Connell, 18, an honor student at Montgomery Blair High School, told the Post he had been using computers for nearly 13 years, often for hours of uninterrupted work. Last year, he began to notice a numbness in his hands, followed by a tingling in his arms, and a burning sensation in his wrists. Connell was eventually diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, a severe form of repetitive strain injury (RSI) -- and evidence that his muscles, tendons, and nerves had been damaged by prolonged typing or use of a computer mouse.

RSI symptoms are showing up increasingly on college campuses. At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Boston, the student health service diagnosed 220 cases of RSI last year -- a 44 percent increase over 1995, according to the Post. At Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., the Post reported, 100 students sought help for the ailment from the Student Disability Resource Center this year, compared to just one student in 1991. And at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, a 1997 survey found that 22 percent of students, faculty, and staff reported RSI symptoms.

Medical experts say kids set the stage for RSI by using poor posture or working long hours at computer terminals without breaks. "Students are using computers earlier and earlier," Anita Barkin, director of student health services at Carnegie Mellon, told the Post. "They are using them in elementary school and high school. By the time they come here, they've already gotten into some bad habits."

E-Wire is prepared with Associated Press (AP) reports.

Reproduced with permission from the September 1998 issue of Electronic School. Copyright © 1998, National School Boards Association. This article may be saved to disk, printed out for individual use, or reproduced in quantities of less than 100 copies for academic use only, provided this copyright notice remains intact on each copy. This article may not be otherwise transmitted or reproduced without the consent of the Publisher. For more information, call (703) 838-6739.


Home / About / Archive

© 1998, NSBA