Home
About
Archive
Electronic School: The School Technology Authority School Board Corner



Current Issue

Search

Forum

Reviews

Meetings

Socket

Links

Spin

How to Advertise

E-Wire: June 2000
New York's portal deal: Doorway to access or to advertising?

New York City schools to advertisers: You help us buy computers. We'll create a portal that gives you access to 1 million schoolchildren.

That was the deal city school board members unanimously approved April 12, after a task force proposed a nine-year plan to distribute laptop computers to all city schoolchildren in return for giving companies space for their logos on a portal, or central web site.

The task force's idea is "to create ubiquitous, online access, 24 hours a day, seven days a week" for children, staff, parents, and others in the school community, said Board Member Victoria Streitfeld. She said the system would include e-mail addresses for everyone from principals to custodians and would help bridge the divide between technology haves and have-nots.

Board members said the proposal offered a means of financing new technology that could not be paid for with tax dollars.

"This is a major shift in the ways we think about teaching and learning and how we fund these activities," said Irving S. Hamer, a board member who oversees the task force.

Offering advertising to corporate partners is the only way to get their assistance in building and maintaining the system, said William C. Thompson Jr., president of the board of education.

Under the plan, laptops will be distributed each year to all 85,000 fourth-graders, beginning in 2001. After nine years, all students in fourth through 12th grade would use their own computers. Students would be able to click on commercial logos on the school web site to buy products, with a portion of each sale going to the board.

Streitfeld said the task force made it clear that curriculum would be separate from the corporate logos.

The schools would expand Internet use in the classroom by creating a portal that allows students to receive homework from teachers, according to the New York Times. Teachers could also use the technology to exchange lesson plans and talk to administrators and parents. The plan is thought to be the first of its kind in the United States, the Times reported.

Some education experts said that with traditional financing sources limited, schools have to look to new avenues of funding. "In a new economy, looking for new opportunities to raise capital is just a survival mechanism," Cheryl S. Williams, director of educational technology programs for the National School Boards Association (NSBA), told the Times.

The project is the latest in a series of corporate forays into the schools. Ever since 1990, when Whittle Communications launched Channel One and its 12-minute daily news show for students, businesses have been increasingly aggressive in trying to reach schoolchildren where they spend much of their weekday hours. Critics say advertising has no place in the schools; companies like Channel One say they are providing a valuable service that students and teachers like.

Eleven years, ago, the New York Board of Regents banned Channel One in the state, saying it exploited classroom time, the Times noted. On April 7, however, Carl T. Hayden, chancellor of the Board of Regents took a much different position on the computer plan, saying it could help introduce students from low-income families to new technologies. He said the proposal could also help ease the state's teacher shortage by making classes available over the Internet.

"In New York City, in particular, the teaching shortage is so severe that one of the most crucial ways of dealing with it might be through the use of technology," Hayden told the Times. "So there may be a compelling need for something like this. But there would have to be ironclad safeguards in place to make sure that children are not exploited."

 


Whirly-Bird Science

There are limits to what a paper airplane can teach about aerodynamics. So students at Felix V. Festa Middle School in West Nyack, N.Y., spent much of the year building a helicopter. The project, drawing on skills and concepts involving science, math, and technology, impressed Hearlihy & Co. in Springfield, Ohio, so much that the educational products company awarded teacher Alan G. Horowitz a $2,000 grant, which he said would "go toward getting the helicopter up in the sky." None of his students would be allowed to fly the craft, he said, but he was taking flying lessons.


E-commerce comes to school

The San Juan, Calif., school district spends $153 million a year on a wide range of goods, from pens and paper to computers and landscaping supplies. But because the district's five-person purchasing staff processes more than 17,000 requests a year, there was little time to hunt for bargains.

"It's highly unlikely for [us] to call around town on a $1,200 purchase just to save $50 or $60," said Mike Kovalchik, senior business director for the California district. "It's just not efficient."

Now, better deals might be in store for overburdened school-purchasing officials like Kovalchik. A proliferation of e-business companies -- serving as middlemen between school districts and vendors -- are offering school districts a chance to hunt for sweeter deals without much effort. The ever-evolving list of e-businesses includes Epylon.com, Simplexis.com, Shop2gether.com, eschoolmall.com, DemandStar.com, and Way2Bid.com.

Schools spend from 5 to 8 percent of their total budgets purchasing supplies and equipment, according to the Association of School Business Officials International. With public school expenditures totaling $335 billion in 1998-99, according to the National Education Association, that's $16 to $26 billion. Add to those figures the costs of purchasing non-tangibles such as insurance and services, and the figure can reach as high as $85 billion for public and private elementary and secondary education, according to investment analysts.

Given the considerable value of this market -- plus the fact that most large private enterprises have successfully captured the power of the Internet to reduce purchasing costs -- it's hardly surprising that e-commerce is making forays into public education. Matt Sanders, a market analyst for Forrester Research Inc. in Cambridge, Mass., said: "To the extent that districts receive improved services at lower costs, [e-commerce] will be a huge win for school districts."

San Juan, for example, has turned to San Francisco-based Epylon.com. Like the other e-commerce start-ups, Eplyon.com offers a place where school administrators can find many of the supplies they need, compare prices, and order immediately. More than 500 school districts have already signed up.

Epylon.com won't charge school districts to use the site. Instead, the company plans to make money by charging suppliers a transaction fee. This should, in theory, save school administrators time and money and speed up delivery of goods.

Epylon.com chairman Kelly Blanton said his company is tailored to help schools that struggle to spend limited funds effectively. "I always got a dollar to do a $1.25 job," said Blanton, a school administrator for 40 years and former superintendent of the Kern County schools in California.

Lamar Alexander, former U.S. secretary of education and Republican presidential candidate, is now chairman of San Francisco-based Simplexis.com, one of Epy-lon.com's competitors. "This is probably the most promising area for saving real dollars to ever come along to public education," Alexander told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Some school districts spend up to $120 in administrative costs for each purchase order they process, Alexander told the paper, and he contended that Simplexis.com could cut that to as low as $25 per purchase.

Simplexis.com -- currently being piloted in Glendale, Calif. -- and other e-commerce companies claim they can cut costs for several reasons. To begin with, online automated purchasing forms reduce paperwork and cut down on the costly errors that often occur with manual input. Up-to-the-minute online status reports help track orders, picking up on problems before they become insurmountable. Beyond this, the companies give school districts more opportunities to combine orders so as to qualify for high-volume discounts.

Even some of the usual critics of corporate involvement in public schools say e-commerce could serve schools well. But, in the same breath, they say the Internet companies won't serve schools well if they promote products directly to students.

Alex Molnar, a professor of education at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and director of the Center for the Analysis of Commercialism in Education, said, "There's nothing inherently evil about e-commerce ... as long as there is no tie-in that touches students in some kind of commercial come-on."

As an example, Molnar pointed to cases in which school districts have purchased laptop computers for students. As part of the purchase agreement, advertisements targeted at students appear on the laptop screen. Districts that do not like this kind of "commercial come-on," Molnar advised, should make that clear to the e-commerce companies, which will undoubtedly attract advertisers.


Up to the Challenge

Young scientists launch space probes and plot rendezvous courses with comets at the new Challenger Learning Center of Greater Washington in Alexandria, Va. The latest of 39 Challenger Learning Centers created by the families of astronauts lost in the 1986 Challenger explosion, this one serves as a flagship, developing new programs for engaging students in math and science around the world.


New standards for tech ed

Technology education shouldn't be limited to what appears on a computer screen, according to new national standards released by the International Technology Education Association (ITEA) in Reston, Va.

Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology starts by noting that the document "correctly does not focus unduly on [computers and the Internet], which comprise only a small part of our vast human-built world." Twenty standards, with benchmarks at different grade levels, lay out what students should know about the history, design, effects, and use of technologies ranging from wheels to spaceships.

With funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), ITEA involved more than 4,000 educators, engineers, technologists, and others in the three-year process of developing, drafting, and reviewing the standards. When they were released in April, many welcomed the new standards as a way of putting everyone on the same page and infusing technology throughout the K-12 curriculum.

But others didn't see much chance of the standards being adopted by states. "The current frenzy for testing and accountability is so extreme that the idea of squeezing something else into the core curriculum ... is highly unlikely," Stanford University Professor Larry Cuban told Education Week.

The 20 standards include such statements as:

  • Students will develop an understanding of the characteristics and scope of technology.
  • Students will develop an understanding of the core concepts of technology.
  • Students will develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study.
  • Students will develop an understanding of the cultural, social, economic, and political effects of technology.
  • Students will develop an understanding of the effects of technology on the environment.

The 248-page report explaining the standards is available from ITEA for $30.


Grade-school virtual reality

Kids are piloting spaceships, planting vegetable gardens, and handling a pulsating human heart -- all without leaving Abraham Lincoln School in Oak Park, Ill.

Lincoln is the first school in the nation to house a semipermanent virtual-reality installation. In a small room just off the school media center, teachers and students crowd around the Immersadesk, a creation of the University of Illinois (UIC) at Chicago's Electronics Visualization Laboratory that projects images on what looks like a cross between a large-screen TV and a drafting table. Students wear special goggles that make the images appear three-dimensional while a teacher uses a handheld wand to make things happen -- to land a spacecraft, for instance, or slice open a pulsating heart.

It's all part of a three-year project, funded by the National Science Foundation, aimed at discovering how virtual learning can be used to improve education.

"History is full of grandiose promises regarding the impact of technology on schools," said UIC computer science professor Thomas Moher, a former member of the District 97 school board in Oak Park. "We're working with an advanced technology that is today well outside the budget of school systems. While we believe that virtual reality may have benefits for learners, we need to pinpoint where those benefits might outweigh costs."

Other schools have used virtual reality in the past, but only on a temporary basis. Researchers said they hoped the length of this project will allow students and teachers to get past the novelty of the technology, so its realistic effect on student learning can be measured.

"We're working very hard to work against the hype," Moher told the Chicago Sun-Times. "We want to get to the point where kids are kind of bored with the technology itself."

But six months after the Immersadesk was installed at Lincoln, kids were still excited. "It's cool that we can do schoolwork, and it's not like we have to just write down on paper," sixth-grader Felicia Bridgers told the Sun-Times. "It's awesome."

Teachers were impressed, too. "There's a lot of excitement around here about this," Kathy Madura told Electronic School. "It's something else for a teacher's bag of tricks, and it helps us tap in to students' imaginations."

For a flat-screen view of virtual learning projects, visit the Tele-Immersive Learning Enviornments.

 


WHO'S ONLINE?

You might think the answer is, "Everyone." But the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) reports otherwise. In schools with Internet access, NCES says, teachers are more likely than students to have access to e-mail, news groups, resource location services, and the World Wide Web. And that goes for public and private schools alike.


Behind the technology gender gap

Young women are steering away from high-tech careers not because the work is hard but because they think the field is boring and antisocial, a new study suggests.

The report from the American Association of University Women (AAUW), released in April, said that among high-tech career paths, "girls outnumbered boys only in their enrollment in word-processing classes, arguably the 1990s version of typing."

The study's authors found that boys were more likely than girls to have computers in their bedrooms and more likely to be sent by their parents to computer camps.

"Instead of trying to make girls fit into the existing computer culture, the computer culture must become more inviting to girls," said Sherry Turkle, professor of sociology at MIT and a cochair of the AAUW Commission on Technology, Gender, and Teacher Education.

The association's researchers based their findings on Internet surveys of 900 teachers and gathered comments from 70 middle schoool and high school female students in Washington, D.C., and its suburbs.

"They're not phobic about computer technology, but disenchanted by it," said Pamela Haag, research director for the AAUW Education Foundation. "What they are saying to us is: 'We can do this, but we don't want to.'"

The report, "Tech-Savvy: Educating Girls in the New Computer Age," elaborates on a 1998 report by the foundation that found girls were closing in on boys in math and science performance. The new report shows that women receive less than 28 percent of computer science bachelor's degrees, down from 37 percent in 1984. Only 20 percent of high-tech jobs are held by women, according to the report.

The persistent "computer geek" stereotype and the lack of high-profile female role models contribute to the trend, according to Haag. "Their term was that they want to see a female Bill Gates," she said.

The report recommends creating computer games that involve strategies and real-life problems to attract girls, as well as revising computer science courses to make them more interesting. Parents and educators should help girls imagine themselves early in life as designers and producers of new technology. They should engage girls in "tinkering" activities that can stimulate deeper interest in technology. Teachers need to make the public face of women in computing more real and less stereotypical. Girls tend to imagine that computer professionals and those who work with information technology live in a solitary, antisocial world.

It also recommends that educators set a new benchmark for gender equity that emphasizes computer fluency -- girls' mastery of analytical skills, computer concepts, and ability to imagine uses for technology across a range of problems and subjects.

"When it comes to today's computer culture, the bottom line is that while more girls are on the train, they aren't the ones driving," said Haag. "To get girls 'under the hood' of technology, they need to see that it gets them where they want to go. And for a large part of that population, the process must start in the classroom."

 


STILL THE BIG APPLE

Apple Computer is still No. 1 in sales in the U.S. education market, according to International Data Corp. (IDC). In its education market report for the fourth quarter of 1999, IDC showed Apple leading in overall U.S. education sales with a 30.6 percent market share. The market research firm also ranked Apple on top for the entire year of 1999, with a 23.6 percent market share. Market analysts attributed the firm's widening lead to the introduction of such popular products as the iBook, iMac, and iMovie.


Parents trust the Internet

Parents believe the Internet is safe, and they want their children to use it, especially for educational activities, according to a survey conducted by the National School Boards Foundation (NSBF), with support from Microsoft and the Children's Television Workshop.

"Safe and Smart: Research and Guidelines for Children's Use of the Internet" is based on interviews with a random sample consisting of 1,735 parents of children ages 2 to 17, and 601 children between the ages of 9 and 17, from the same households.

"This survey gives school leaders and families a new, shared understanding of the increasing importance and value of the Internet in children's education," said Anne L. Bryant, executive director of the National School Boards Association. "Based on these findings, we believe schools and families should work together to guide children to good content on the Internet, both in school and at home."

According to the study, parents trust their children's use of the Internet and generally believe it's a safe place. Most parents forego the "watchdog" role for a "guide" role, adopting a common-sense, balanced approach to their children's Internet use. Parents monitor the sites their children visit, limit their time spent online, and set other rules about usage. (Sixty-seven percent of parents surveyed said their role is as a guide to good content.)

The study also found that girls use the Internet as much as boys (50 percent of 9- to 12-year-old girls are online, compared with 46 percent of boys; 73 percent of 13- to 17-year-old girls use the Internet, contrasted with 70 percent of boys).

The study suggests that schools have an opportunity to help narrow the gap between the technology haves and have-nots. Already schools provide significant Internet access for students who otherwise would not have access. (In families with incomes of less than $40,000, 76 percent of 9- to 17-year-olds who use the Internet say that they log on at school; in African American families, 80 percent of 9- to 17-year-olds say they log on at school.) The main reason cited by parents for buying home computers and obtaining home Internet access is their children's learning or education (45 percent).

The guidelines recommend:

  • Pay as much attention to highlighting good content as restricting bad content.
  • Develop a plan to help schools, teachers, and parents educate children about safe, responsible Internet use. For example, put computers in rooms that are shared, teach children not to give out personal information, and participate in an online safety program.
  • Foster appropriate use of the Internet among preschoolers and other young children.
  • Help teachers, parents, and children use the Internet more effectively for learning. For example, suggest education-related web sites for parents and children to visit together, offer after-school tutoring online, and provide teacher training to integrate the Internet into lessons.
  • Use the Internet to communicate more effectively with parents and students and stimulate parent involvement. For example, post exemplary student work online with teacher comments, create a school web site, and encourage parents to e-mail teachers.
  • Engage the community by encouraging computer and Internet training and hosting forums to discuss children's use of technology for education.

 


BIG SPENDERS

U.S. school districts spent $6.7 billion on educational technology during the 1998-99 school year, up from $5.4 billion in 1997, reports Quality Education Data (QED), a Denver-based research firm. This growth -- a 24 percent increase -- is the highest percentage increase since QED began tracking ed tech budgets a decade ago. Districts spent some 43 percent of their technology budgets on hardware in 1998-99, averaging $60.56 per student. That number is projected to drop this year to $46.98, or 35 percent of budget. Increased spending is projected in networks, software, peripherals, and professional development.

TECH SUPPORT STRATEGIES

Want to control the costs of tech support? Take a lesson from more than 120 technologically advanced districts and rely on teachers, librarians, and other nontechnology staff to provide support. Then, you might limit the ability of teachers and students to modify the way computers are configured and take steps to standardize the model of computer used throughout your district. Those were the strategies cited most frequently in a survey conducted last fall by the Consortium for School Networking and the Education Technology Programs of the National School Boards Association (NSBA). The districts, members of NSBA's Technology Leadership Network (TLN), also said they rely on students to provide support as a way of controlling costs.

E-Wire is prepared with Associated Press (AP) reports.

Reproduced with permission from the June 2000 issue of Electronic School. Copyright © 2000, National School Boards Association. Electronic School is an editorially independent publication of the National School Boards Association. Opinions expressed by this magazine or any of its authors do not necessarily reflect positions of the National School Boards Association. This article may be printed out and photocopied for individual or educational use, provided this copyright notice appears on each copy. This article may not be otherwise transmitted or reproduced in print or electronic form without the consent of the Publisher. For more information, call (703) 838-6739.

Got a comment about this article?
Voice your opinion on our message board!

Want to stay in touch?
Sign up for our e-mail newsletter!

Letters to the Editor: letters@electronic-school.com
Free trial subscription: subscriptions@electronic-school.com
Article submissions: editor@electronic-school.com
Reprint requests: reprints@electronic-school.com
Advertising inquiries: advertising@electronic-school.com
Webmaster: webmaster@electronic-school.com


Home / About / Archive

© 2000, NSBA