Home
About
Archive
Electronic School: The School Technology Authority School Board Corner

Current Issue Cover

Current Issue

Search

Forum

Reviews

Meetings

Socket

Links

Spin

How to Advertise

 

E-Wire


CEO Forum: Technology can raise acievement
Disparity persists in Internet access
Internet-based classes fill up
Teachers fight Web plagiarism
Gone with the inkwell
What works in distance learning
50% right, 100% richer
Coming soon to a desk near you


CEO Forum: Technology can raise achievement

Technology can change the way students think and learn and revolutionize education," says the CEO Forum on Education and Technology, a five-year partnership of business and education leaders that monitors progress toward integrating technology into America's schools.

"The way to obtain the maximum return on our [$43.6 billion] national investment in education technology is to focus technology on the key building blocks of student achievement -- assessment, alignment, accountability, access, and analysis," concludes the forum's fourth report, Key Building Blocks for Student Achievement in the 21st Century.

The report also calls for broadening the definition of student achievement to include digital-age literacy, inventive thinking, effective communication, and high productivity -- skills necessary for students to thrive in the 21st century.

"Some critics wrongly dismiss the investment in education technology as wasted when test scores do not immediately improve. ... This is a dangerous mistake," said CEO Forum Cochair Anne L. Bryant, executive director of the National School Boards Association.

"Our nation is already experiencing some of the benefits of technology in education," she said. "It is time to take the final steps to integrate technology into instruction to improve student achievement and ensure technology benefits students, teachers, administrators, parents, and communities nationwide."

According to the report, technology can help deliver significant results when combined with other key factors known to increase achievement, such as clear, measurable objectives; parental and community involvement; increased time spent on task; frequent feedback; and teacher subject matter expertise.

The forum concludes that technology can help achieve "dramatic results" for students:

* Improved scores on standardized tests. A four-year study demonstrated significant gains on the SAT. Students who participated in an integrated technology curriculum scored 54 points higher in the verbal section and 34 points higher in math.

* Increased application and production of knowledge for the real world. Technology allows teachers and students to augment the curriculum with current information and timely study of real-world events, thus making learning more dynamic, engaging, and valuable. Studies have shown that students who used simulations, microcomputer-based laboratories, and video to connect science instruction to real-world problems outperformed students who used traditional instructional methods alone.

* Increased ability for students to manage learning. In a student-centered environment made possible by educational technology, students are able to define individual objectives and create an accountability plan to reach them. This ownership of and responsibility for learning encourages students to be more directly engaged in the educational process. And technology offers many tools for self-assessment, allowing students to monitor their own progress.

* Increased ability to promote achievement for special needs students, including learning disabled, low-achieving, special education, and gifted students.

In addition, the report concludes, improved access to information increases knowledge, inquiry, and depth of investigation. No longer confined to textbooks, students can use technology to delve more deeply into a subject and immediately find additional materials. This increases expertise and research skills, translating into improved student achievement

The CEO Forum proposes six recommendations to ensure that the nation's investment in education technology improves student achievement:

1. The nation should focus education technology investments on specific educational objectives.

2. States should incorporate 21st-century skills into their standards by 2002.

3. States should update their assessment systems to include 21st-century skills by 2003. Technology should be used in assessments, so that the methods of assessment accurately reflect the tools employed in instruction.

4. States, districts, and schools should adopt continuous improvement strategies to measure progress.

5. Federal and state governments, school districts, institutions of higher education, think tanks, and foundations should fund research and development to determine the most effective uses of technology to improve student achievement.

6. All students should have equitable access to technology. -- Carol Chmelynski, assistant managing editor, School Board News



Jim Finne, consulting engineer (left), and Matt Zullo tinker with a robot they designed and built with a team of other educators in a competition at Middlesex County College in Edison, N.J. The competition was the culmination of a one-week workshop designed to provide teachers with new techniques in teaching science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Supported by the National Science Foundation and the New Jersey Center for Advanced Technology Education, the program paired teams of teachers with engineers from major companies to gain hands-on knowledge of activities similar to those in student competitions.

Building for Tomorrow

Disparity persists in Internet access

Although almost all U.S. public schools are now connected to the Internet, not all provide equal levels of access to individual students, according to a recent report from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).

Released in May, Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2000 reports that 98 percent of public schools had Internet access in 2000 -- a dramatic increase since 1994, when the connect rate was 35 percent. In schools with higher poverty levels and minority enrollments, however, fewer instructional classrooms are connected to the Internet, and the ratio of students to computers is higher.

In schools with the highest concentration of students in poverty -- defined as 75 percent of students or more eligible for free or reduced-price lunch -- only 60 percent of classrooms were connected in 2000, compared to 82 percent for schools with the lowest concentration of students in poverty (35 percent of students or less eligible for free or reduced-price lunch). That same year, only 64 percent of classrooms in schools with the highest minority enrollments (50 percent or more) were connected, compared to 85 percent in schools with the lowest minority enrollment (6 percent or less).

The overall ratio of students to instructional computers decreased from 6 to 1 in 1999, to 5 to 1 in 2000. A 5 to 1 ratio is considered by some educators to be a reasonable level for effective instructional use.

The overall ratio of students to Internet-connected instructional computers also decreased -- from 9 to 1 in 1999, to 7 to 1 in 2000. Once again, however, a disparity was found: The ratio was 9 to 1 in schools with the highest concentration of students in poverty, compared to 6 to 1 in schools with the lowest.

The study also looked at how schools connect to the Internet, the accommodations they make for students to have Internet access outside regular school hours, and what schools are doing to prevent students from accessing inappropriate material.

NCES found significant changes have taken place in the type and speed of Internet connections in public schools. More than 75 percent of public schools connected to the Internet in 2000 used dedicated lines, whereas dial-up connections represented almost 75 percent of connected schools in 1996.

To help students who would otherwise not have access to the Internet outside regular school hours for homework or other school-related activities, 54 percent of public schools provided access to their students before or after school or on weekends in 2000.

Most public schools (98 percent) had acceptable-use policies, and 91 percent had in place at least one procedure or blocking or filtering technology to control student access to inappropriate Internet material. Typical mechanisms included teacher or staff monitoring, blocking or filtering software, student honor codes, and intranet systems.

The report is based on survey data collected from a national representative sample of more than 1,100 public schools. NCES has conducted annual surveys on Internet connectivity since 1994. Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994-2000 is available online. -- Ismat Abdal-Haqq, contributing editor to Electronic School and manager, ITTE technology publications


Internet-Based Classes Fill Up

In this age of computers, many educators see it as inevitable that students will someday learn in classrooms without walls, desks, or face-to-face contact with teachers.

Maryland plans to open a virtual high school for accelerated classes, remediation, and students who cannot make it to school. Texas students have used Web-based classes to fulfill requirements in the summer so they can take electives during the school year. Michigan has sent teen parents to virtual schools, and Kentucky has tested Web-based classes in juvenile detention centers. Other states see possibilities for home-schooled students.

Education officials in Maryland describe themselves as relative newcomers to Web-based learning. At least a half-dozen states have established virtual schools, and about a third of states either have a virtual school or plan to create one.

When Maryland officials began studying the possibility more than a year ago, they saw it as a way to offer Advanced Placement classes to students who did not have them in their own school buildings.

It was soon clear that a virtual school could offer remedial classes to low-performing students, or basic classes to those who can't attend school due to long-term illnesses or behavioral problems.

"We looked at it from the very beginning as an accelerated or enrichment area. Then, of course, we saw the remedial piece,'' said John Cox, an assistant superintendent in Charles County, who is helping to plan the state's virtual school.

The state hopes to open its online school in fall 2002. Local schools will help the state identify students who would thrive in Web-based classes.

Kentucky saw many of the same uses but had to meet the needs of a rural, agricultural state that includes the impoverished Appalachian region.

Bob Fortney of the Kentucky Virtual High Schoolsaid the state has used Web-based learning to make certain that students from small, rural schools have the same opportunities as their urban counterparts.

Kentucky has also used on-line classes to address teacher shortages, particularly in foreign languages.

Enrollment at Kentucky's virtual high school has increased tenfold since it opened in January 2000 to about 500 students.

"What we're starting to find out, having almost finished our third semester, is we think we're raising the bar in achievement,'' Fortney said. "We can offer rigorous classes to students who might not have them in their building.'' -- Sheila Hotchkin, Associated Press


Teachers fight Web plagiarism

Before her students write term papers, Melanie Hazen makes sure they understand one small thing: You can't put your name on someone else's work. Still, they don't see the harm in borrowing from a Web site.

"Taking something straight off the Internet and using it as their own, they don't seem to think that's stealing at all,'' said Hazen, an English teacher at Montgomery Central High School in Clarksville, Tenn.

At a time when most schools and public libraries are wired to the Internet, students of all ages are being tempted more than ever to cut-and-paste others' work and pass it off as their own.

For students, plagiarism has never been easier. For teachers, combating it has never been more of a challenge. A handful of teachers, in Los Angeles for the National Education Association's annual meeting in July, talked about their experiences. They stressed that the vast bazaar of information online requires not only eternal vigilance but a back-to-basics emphasis on drafts, outlines, note cards, and other skills to produce solid writing from students.

Plagiarism is nothing new, but the Internet has made it so convenient that the average student finds it hard to resist, Hazen and others said.

"It's the same thing we were doing 20 or 30 years ago -- it's just that the Internet wasn't an option,'' said Dean Vogel, an elementary school counselor in Vacaville, Calif., who chairs the Web Site Advisory Committee for the California Teachers Association. Still, he said, "The reality is, few kids cheat.''

A recent Rutgers University survey suggests otherwise. More than half of the 4,500 high school students surveyed said they'd downloaded an essay from the Internet or copied at least a few sentences. Around 20 percent of college students admitted the same.

If Internet plagiarism is widespread, it's no wonder. With a few clicks of a mouse, students can access an estimated 600 cheating sites, such as cheathouse. com or www.schoolsucks.com. Those with a credit card can click their way to thousands of essays on nearly any topic for around $60-$100.

Go to your favorite Internet search site and type in "free term papers,'' along with the title of a classic book that bedeviled you in high school. You'll soon see a long list of sites offering free term papers, plus many more for sale. Most sites will e-mail, fax, or express mail the papers, no questions asked.

Web sites such as turnitin.com offer teachers one solution. Subscribing teachers simply direct students to upload their paper to the Web site, where the text is compared to an estimated 1.5 billion pages already floating around cyberspace. The service then produces an "originality report'' that a teacher uses to compare the student's work with other essays. But teachers said the most effective tool is simply knowing one's students.

"A good teacher knows if that student wrote that or not,'' said Nancye Jennings, a third-grade reading teacher in Fairhope, Ala., who has also taught middle school students. "Once you've had them in class, you can tell. You get a feel for the way they say things, the way they put words together.''

Of course, small class sizes and teaching loads help, the teachers said, but so does taking the time to teach students about how to develop their own ideas.

"If you set up the process and go through it correctly, I think most of the time you can end up with original work from all of your kids,'' said Lois Delmore, an English teacher at Red River High School in Grand Forks, N.D.

"I think you also need to teach students that that writing is theirs -- it's valuable -- and they do good stuff,'' she said. -- Greg Toppo, Associated Press


Gone with the inkwell

The days of lovely, flowing -- even legible -- handwriting in schools have gone the way of the Palmer Method of penmanship. "Twenty years ago, the handwriting was much more legible," said Virginia science teacher Helen Wood, who also works as a calligrapher. "Technology has changed everything, and it's changed this." Bad penmanship can be downright dangerous: Medication errors arising from illegible handwriting account for thousands of deaths annually, and millions of letters and packages wind up in the U.S. Postal Service's dead-letter office each year for the same reason.


What Works in Distance Learning?

The University of Nebraska (UNL) has developed a center to study what works and what doesn't work in distance education and computer-aided learning.

"We have a lot of anecdotes and a lot of testimonials" about technology in education, said Roger Bruning, director of education for the university's National Center for Information Technology in Education. "The niche that we're filling is to ... look at these things systematically."

Not much is known about how students learn with technology or how teachers can make the best use of the technology available, Bruning said. "I think [technology] can have a range of effects from very bad to very, very good," he said. At their best, computers can enhance the work of the teacher and add to the learning experience. At their worst, they simply take up room in the classroom.

The newly completed center -- a joint effort of UNL's Teachers College and Nebraska Educational Telecommunications -- hopes to attract scholars from across the country.


50% right, 100% rich

When Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates was in high school, he knew much more about computers than his teachers did. So it seemed appropriate when Gates visited Miami's Booker T. Washington High School that senior Elie Philippe knew a couple of things about computers that the world's wealthiest man did not. Gates, who announced a donation of $1.1 million worth of computers to four Florida districts, missed two of four questions on an online quiz. Philippe knew the answers to all four -- including the ones involving computer translation and electromagnetic interference that stumped Gates.


Coming soon to a desk near you

What's the next best thing to having a computer for every student? How about a touch pad on every desk?

That's what an Idaho principal has in mind. Dennis Sonius always believed classroom learning could be accelerated if every student were working on the computer along with the teacher.

"But that meant too many computers in the classroom -- you'd run out of space," said Sonius, principal of Morningside Elementary School in Twin Falls. "I wanted something simple, something that kids could interact with from their desks, and it had to be wireless."

When he couldn't find such a product on the market, Sonius repaired to his basement workshop. There, with the help of three University of Idaho engineering students, he came up with Mousenet.

The patented system, which uses the same kind of communication signal as a cell phone, consists of one unit for the teacher and a 3-by-4-inch rectangular device for each student. The teacher punches in a signal to the student of choice, who responds by rubbing the touch pad.

Kathy Muus, a fifth-grade teacher at Morningside, field-tested the system in a geography lesson. Muus would project a computerized map, ask a particular student to identify a city or land form, and get an immediate response.

"The kids loved the concept," she said -- and they were amazed that their very own principal had invented the system.


Virtual driver ed

Instead of starting their driver ed classes behind the wheel of a car, some students are getting started behind a computer keyboard.

Buhler High School in Kansas began what's said to be that state's first online driver education program this past spring, according to Stefani Curchy, assistant principal and a driving instructor who helped create the program.

Students study a textbook at home and take quizzes at any computer with Internet access. They're required to show up for a final exam -- and to take on-road driving lessons -- but the rest of the work can be done at the students' own pace.

Students must score 80 percent on each quiz to move forward in the program. If a student has trouble with a quiz, an instructor e-mails or calls to help, and the student then has another opportunity to pass.

"While it's not face-to-face, we still contact them and e-mail them," Curchy said. "Also, most of the learning still takes place in the car, which is similar to any other driver education program."

Online driver education and traffic safety programs are available in other states, as well, including California and Indiana. The American Driver & Traffic Safety Education Association calls online education "an acceptable method" of delivering the classroom component of a course but says "the behind-the-wheel instruction phase of driver education should not be attempted by computer-assisted methods. It should occur only in a car."




E-Wire is prepared with Associated Press (AP) reports.

Copyright © 2001, National School Boards Association. Electronic School is an editorially independent publication of the National School Boards Association. Opinions expressed by this magazine or any of its authors do not necessarily reflect positions of the National School Boards Association. Within the parameters of fair use, this article may be printed out and photocopied for individual or educational use, provided this copyright notice appears on each copy. This article may not be otherwise linked, transmitted, or reproduced in print or electronic form without the consent of the Publisher. For more information, call (703) 838-6739.

Got a comment about this article?
Voice your opinion on our message board!

Want to stay in touch?
Sign up for our e-mail newsletter!

Letters to the Editor: letters@electronic-school.com
Free trial subscription: subscriptions@electronic-school.com
Article submissions: editor@electronic-school.com
Reprint requests: reprints@electronic-school.com
Advertising inquiries: advertising@electronic-school.com
Webmaster: webmaster@electronic-school.com


Home / About / Archive

© 2001, NSBA