Return to the February 1995 Table of ContentsBy Lisa Brandes
Lisa Brandes is president of Education Funding Alternatives, a consulting firm in El Cerrito, Calif.
More and more school people are exploring funding alternatives for
technology, but before you go looking for freebies, you need to
understand what a donation will "cost" your school. Not all deals
are as good as they sound. A good deal is one in which the benefits
received from the donation far outweigh the costs to your
organization.
In schools, I've found, confusion often arises over what I call a
gift's "cost-benefit ratio." Ascertaining this ratio is useful when
considering grants, pilot tests, and donations of used equipment.
Don't get me wrong: Each is an excellent source for receiving the
technology your schools so desperately need. But none is exactly
"free."
The first thing most educators say when they talk about purchasing
technology is, "I'll bet we could get a grant for that." Have you
ever heard anyone discuss the purchase of textbooks in that way?
People seem to assume unlimited money is out there for technology,
just waiting to be requested. Unfortunately, nothing could be
further from the truth. Most grant funding is difficult to come by
and takes a lot of time and energy to acquire.
This might come as a big surprise to first-time grant-seekers, but
it takes just as much work to get a grant for $2,500 as it does to
get a grant for $25,000. So it makes sense to focus your proposal
efforts on larger opportunities and leave the smaller ticket items
to other types of fund-raising activities. Parent/teacher groups,
for instance, can be an excellent source of funds for projects under
$3,000--especially if the groups have moved beyond "bake sale" style
fund-raisers.
Making fund-raising efforts pay off is often a matter of investing
time (and even money) up front in training. Rather than hiring a
proposal writer to put together your grant submission, consider
hiring a fund-raising specialist to train your staff and parents on
how to develop proposals and approach funders. Like the training
approach used in the Peace Corps, this approach teaches you how to
raise funds yourself, rather than relying on someone else to do it
for you or wasting time on trial and error.
Let me warn you at the outset: It is almost impossible to find a
grant that will fund an entire technology project. And from the
funder's perspective, that makes perfect sense. Funders assume that
if the project or product you want to provide to your students is
really important, you will find ways to contribute to its support
financially. If you don't, then you've just, in effect, told the
funder you're interested in the project only if someone else will
pay for it. With lots of other organizations competing for the same
grant dollars, funders are likely to focus their efforts where
recipients seem most sincere.
Another hidden cost of grant funding is the time it takes you to get
the grant. In addition to the time necessary to develop a carefully
crafted proposal, it can take as long as 18 months between the time
the proposal is submitted and the time a decision is finally made.
Obviously, if you are looking for a quick solution to technology
funding problems, this might not be it.
Another area where confusion often arises is pilot testing. The lure
of receiving "free" equipment from vendors in return for testing
their products is very appealing. And indeed, it can be an excellent
way to acquire some of the technology your schools need. Still, you
should watch for a number of things.
First and foremost, make sure the materials your schools will be
using as part of the pilot test meet your curriculum goals. If not,
you're paying in wasted school hours for the equipment the vendor is
providing "free."
Second, find out whether you will have full control over the use of
the equipment during the pilot test. If not--if the equipment can be
used only for the piloted materials, for example--you can't really
consider it free equipment.
Calculate the amount of classroom disruption time the pilot test
will cause. Include vendors' visits to the classroom, bringing
personnel from other school districts to see the installation, and
the like. Be aware of how the details of the pilot test will affect
your teaching schedule.
Finally, if the equipment will be taken away at the end of the pilot
test, remember to compare the benefits of its usage against the cost
of renting the equipment for the same length of time, not the
purchase price. Is there any advantage to having short-term use of
the technology in question? Many consider such arrangements a
disadvantage because of the amount of training time invested in the
start-up.
Many corporations donate used technology equipment to schools and
other nonprofit organizations as they replace older items with newer
models. In fact, specialized organizations exist solely to serve as
brokers between donors and recipients.
Acquiring equipment in this way has significant benefits, but it has
a downside as well. On the plus side, few costs are associated with
acquiring used equipment, and it rarely requires the submission of
a formal proposal. But you might find you need to purchase a great
deal of ancillary equipment to make the donated equipment work for
your purposes.
Before accepting used equipment, ask yourself whether it is the
exact type of technology you would purchase if you had the money.
And find out whether it will limit your software choices or possibly
eliminate some kinds of programs. Remember that curricular
considerations should drive technology choices. If accepting donated
equipment means you can't provide adequate curriculum to your
students, then the cost of that equipment is high indeed.
Other disadvantages: Maintenance costs generally are higher on older
equipment, and the amount of downtime is greater. These
considerations might not be deal-breakers, but you should factor
them into your decisions about accepting used equipment.
In each of these scenarios, we have been looking at a variation of
cost-benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis is nothing more than
balancing the costs of an endeavor against its benefits and then
determining whether the endeavor is worth the effort. Ordinarily,
these kinds of analyses are used in business to determine the
feasibility of different actions, such as upgrading production
equipment, developing a new product, or entering a new market. Many
people are discovering, however, that business techniques such as
this can be useful in education and other nonprofit enterprises as
well.
How do you determine the cost-benefit ratio of a gift? At a minimum,
you need to include the cost of any labor required to obtain the
item and any costs associated with maintaining it. You should also
include in your cost calculations any lost opportunities related to
the gift, such as disruption to teaching time.
You then compare this information with the cost of purchasing and
maintaining the same equipment for the same period of time, without
any contributions. The difference in the two figures becomes your
cost-benefit comparison and helps you determine whether the "free"
equipment is worth it to you.
For example, suppose a local corporation offers your school 15 used
personal computers. At first, you're ecstatic--15 more PCs for your
technology lab! But before you accept the donation, you decide to
look at the cost-benefit ratio.
The machines are four-year-old 286 personal computers. With an
anticipated maximum useful life of about five years, they offer only
about a year of productive use. In addition, most of the software
your school is using these days requires a 386 machine at least, so
the 286s will need an upgrade right away--at a cost of about $500
each. In addition, a maintenance contract on the 15 PCs will run
approximately $4,300 a year, and you'll have to hire a technician to
install the hardware and integrate it into your existing system--at
a cost of about $1,200.
Given these figures, you'll have to pay approximately $13,000 for
the "free" equipment--an average of $867 per computer. Instead, why
not thank the corporation but decline the donation, suggesting that
the company sell the used equipment and donate the proceeds to the
school. Then add the same $13,000 to the cash donation, and you'll
probably be able to buy 15 brand new PCs that fit your technology
plan and will serve your students for the next five years.
The objective of cost-benefit analysis is not to inundate you with
data but, rather, to help make sense of those data. And in theory,
working through the process for each grant, pilot test, or donation
will give you a clear answer. But as you well know, reality often
works out differently than theory. More often than not, what emerges
are marginal differences in costs and benefits, which means you have
to make a judgment call: Is this a good idea or not? When it comes
to that, at least you'll have the facts.
Read the sidebar: "And Say Thank You"
Return to the February 1995 Table of Contents
Go to the top of this document
Return to the Electronic School home page