Aim Straight At The Curriculum
Return to the February 1995 Table of Contents
Aim Straight At The Curriculum
A technology goal schools can agree on: Teach crucial skills
By Liz Whitaker
Liz Whitaker is coordinator for instructional technology in the
Tucson (Ariz.) Unified School District.
To get 104 schools using technology to support district goals,
you've got to point, then click, right at the curriculum. That's the
heart of a school system, and it's where real change can be
accomplished. But you can't just snap your fingers and expect to
switch instructional delivery overnight. In the Tucson (Ariz.)
Unified School District, all technology projects are integrated
directly into instruction. It has taken five years to get here.
Five years ago, the citizens of Tucson approved a bond that granted
$38 million for instructional technology. Before rushing to decide
what hardware and software to buy, we took a long look at our
curriculum. The superintendent worked with the community to
transform the district curriculum by adding a fourth R: readiness
for the world of work.
Beyond the basic skills, the list of the desired characteristics of
our graduates now includes communications, technology, and critical-thinking skills. We also added another goal: Our graduates will be
able to communicate in both English and Spanish, which are the
languages most characteristic of our area.
Our core curriculum reflects these goals. Whether the subject is
language arts, mathematics, science, or social studies, the emphasis
is on active, hands-on participation in learning. Technology is used
as a tool in effectively correlating these objectives with
instructional strategies in the classroom.
It is this successful correlation between curriculum and technology
that the district has been working on for the past five years. We've
learned a lot. The Tucson Unified School District has about 60,000
K-12 students, who come from various backgrounds. About 50 percent
of our students are classified "minority." The 104 school sites
include 14 magnet schools and a variety of special education and
alternative education programs. And they all use technology to
support the overarching school district goal of preparing students
for the 21st century.
Nine lessons
The district's long-term plans for instructional technology derive
from the district management and assessment plan, called ACTion
2000. The following are some guidelines culled from our experience:
- Pull together a team of diverse people to develop a district
plan. Give them clear, concise directions. A team of 40 people
representing teachers, school executives, central support personnel,
parents, and community members developed our overall plan. Members
reviewed pertinent district documents, then a draft of the plan was
reviewed by personnel at every site. After that, we held a
communitywide teleconference inviting feedback. The final plan was
approved by the school board.
- Break down the plan, setting realistic time frames for each
accomplishment. Allow budget and projects to build on each other.
The Instructional Technology Bond Project was divided into 20
subprojects, each of which has specified funds and indicates general
types of technology purchases for a specific level or school
setting. These projects were put into a six-year time frame. This
process assumed that a) it is impossible to do everything all at
once; b) no one solution will solve all the needs; and c) technology
will change over time, so you need to build in some flexibility.
- Make teachers a part of the entire process. To plan and implement
each subproject, we build a task team of school-site representatives
and some members of the original master team. Working together, the
task teams study relevant curriculum documents and look for software
to support the curriculum.
- Don't buy anything just because it looks good. Research
carefully--and remember the district's goals. One of our largest
subprojects was the Elementary Learning Lab. This purchase came
after careful evaluation of four pilot labs: Two used integrated
learning systems; one was a managed-skills lab (that is, a lab that
used individually managed pieces of software); and the fourth was a
tool-based lab, which included word-processing, database, and
spreadsheet programs, as well as HyperCard and paint-and-draw
software. Our research showed that students using the tool-based lab
made larger gains in mathematics on state assessments than other
students did. In addition, teacher evaluation of the software
indicated a strong preference for the more interactive, student-directed tool software. Finally, observations of students in these
labs indicated that students spent more time on task using that kind
of software.
In the case of our high school business applications and programming
lab, we first surveyed the equipment and software being used in the
Tucson business community. The result: We decided to outfit each
high school with a lab of 32 IBM 55SX computers networked using
Novell software. Student software includes Microsoft Word,
WordPerfect, Lotus 1-2-3, and a variety of other software used in
business and industry.
- Make software purchases complement other district course
materials. Give software selection the same weight you give textbook
adoption. The Elementary Learning Lab was purchased initially with
language arts software. Initial software included a broad spectrum
of word processing, reading, writing, and publishing tools. Software
for the other subject areas is being added as materials are adopted
so that the software complements the other adopted materials. The
same teams that recommend the classroom materials for the subject
areas also recommend the software for the lab.
Consistent with our goal of having students become proficient in
English and Spanish, school board policy requires the purchase of
student software in both languages.
- Keep learning as you buy software. This will help in making
subsequent purchases. Put some money aside for new purchases. The
purchases for high school science were driven by the desire to
enable students to "act like scientists." The resulting purchases
allow students in earth science to use the computer to process
images of objects in outer space, and students in biological
sciences to process microscopic images of cells. We then added
ClarisWorks tool software in both English and Spanish, and a
statistical analysis software package so students could enter,
analyze, and display results of their lab studies.
- Use local resources, especially if they're willing to do more
than just tell you what to do. The University of Arizona, in
partnership with the school district, received a grant to train all
high school science teachers in the use of image processing, where
students use computer enhancements, such as color shading, to bring
out indistinct images in their science classes. This teacher-training program enabled teachers to gain skills using this
technology and helped them formulate their instructional strategies.
The partnership played a large part in bringing image-processing
software into the science labs.
- Don't stint on training--it should be ongoing, available, and
easy. Increase the number of people who can train others. All
training emphasizes using technology with materials referenced to
the core curriculum. Nearly all of the 2,500 classroom teachers in
our district participated in six hours of training when they
received their classroom workstation, and five more hours when a lab
was installed in their building. Five technology trainers, supported
by Chapter 2 funds, developed sample activities and demonstrated
them for teachers. These five district-level trainers work with
school-site trainers, who in turn help teachers at their schools.
(These site people are paid extra to attend meetings and training
sessions.) The district trainers also work with the local community
college to offer optional training courses that teachers can take
for credit.
- If it's broken, fix it. And be quick about it. The Tucson Unified School District now has over 10,000 microcomputers and peripherals.
As the district becomes increasingly dependent on technology to
support learning, it is imperative that the technology continue to
be operational. Hardware is purchased with extended warranties.
Centrally, there are six electronics technicians devoted to computer
and audio/video technology repair. As additional hardware and
software has been added to the school sites, school-based technical
support has been added. This support person does frontline
troubleshooting, manages networks, and maintains software and
hardware inventories.
For additional information, contact Liz Whitaker, Tucson Unified
School District, Coordinator, Instructional Technology, P.O. Box
40400, 1010 E. 10th St., Tucson, Ariz. 85717; telephone (602) 792-
6129; fax (602) 882-2479; E-mail: lwhitak@tucsonud.k12.az.us.
Reproduced with permission from the February 1995 issue of Electronic School.
Copyright 1995, National School Boards Association. This article may be saved
to disk, downloaded, or printed for individual use, but may not be otherwise transmitted
or reproduced without the consent of the Publisher. Send inquiries to electronic-school@nsba.org.
Return to the February 1995 Table of Contents
Go to the top of this document
Return to the Electronic School home page